This movie was interesting because Jan Schlichtmann who was originally a greedy personal injury lawyer decides to take on case due to the potentially large settlement involved. The reader will be amazed to discover the amount of preparation necessary for personal injury litigation and the tremendous cost of such civil suits. I couldn't put it down. Epidemiological studies conducted by the National Research Council in 1991 found that, although scares of toxic waste ran rampant following the Woburn incident and another toxic waste spill in Love Canal in 1978, the threat of toxic waste was largely overblown given that it had a minimal effect on overall health in the U. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
What you want is a superb technician. The lawsuit, filed by their attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, alleged that improper disposal of toxic chemicals used on the defendants' properties polluted the local ground water that flowed to the two municipal wells, was distributed in Woburn's water-supply system, and consumption of the polluted water caused severe illnesses including leukemia. There was just no way I was going to turn out the light and roll over. Jonathan Harr's novel 'A Civil Action' traces the course of a civil suit filed by one town member against a food company and a chemical plant. Watching it, we realize that Grisham's lawyers are romanticized hotshots living in a cowboy universe with values. He spent over two million dollars on geologists, epidemiologists, doctors, and law professors, as well as on medical and groundwater tests, all trying to prove that the two companies knowingly polluted the water and poisoned his clients. He was never suited for the difficult job that faced him.
Grace may have been publically embarrassed and lost a bit of money in the short term, but will clearly live to see another day without much cause to worry in the long term. Conversely, if one of these firms does take your case, chances are decent that some money will be paid by the defendants--after years of litigation. The town is Woburn, Massachusetts. But at least Harr didn't go entirely Erin Brokovich, but did present the reasons the defendants could argue the science behind the allegations was, shall we say, not necessarily solid. It made a rather fascinating introduction into the law. Five of the children died from leukemia or complications of having leukemia. Because of the scientific complexity of the epidemiological, geological, and hydrological evidence, Judge Skinner divided the trial into four parts.
The lawyers for the tanneries' parent corporations are not easy to intimidate, a judge makes a key ruling against the plaintiffs, and soon Jan and his partners find themselves in a position where their professional and financial survival has been staked on the outcome of the case. Duvall plays Jerome Facher, brilliant and experienced, who hides his knowledge behind a facade of eccentricity. The author did an artful job telling this story, but it further damaged the credibility of the legal profession. After the first couple of pages, the book took off and held me on the edge of the seat right through to the end. While the author focuses on the prosecution's claim, he doesn't leave out the perspective of the companies, though the bias is clearly favoring the prosecution. Though the trial itself lasted a mere five months, the case began long ago. It was over-wordy, extremely biased, and sloppy with details.
With the dissatisfying fade out, through a half-dozen false promise finales, there comes an insatiable craving for a last ditch surprise witness, the emergence of some concealed evidence, the killer closing speech with all those deviously unorthodox courtroom theatrics. If these few dozen law firms all take a pass, it's likely the case would be thrown out for one reason or another or the case is just not worth all the expenses in terms of a potential recovery. So I heartily recommend this for anyone wanting to read about the American legal system in process, or for anyone who just loves a great story. The jury deliberated for nine days and found W. Interesting if you can stand all the politics and environmental law stuff. The trial began in February 1986 amid much local media coverage and nationally broadcast segments on '60 Minutes' and 'Nightline.
Hope I didn't spoil it for you! That is not the key point at all. But the lawyers of the leather company's mother company are not easy to get to, and soon Schlichtmann and his friends find themselves in a battle of mere survival. But ultimately, just like the Greeks in 300, Schlictmann standing up against more powerful forces simply causes him to lose everything. One in a 50,000 might be able to go all the way successfully. I liked the complex characters and detailed writing, and it's a good book to pass the time with. However, it's one case that could ruin Jan: his pride, his ambition, and ultimately, his career. But children are diagnosed with leukemia and start dying.
Schlictmann won his ethical victory, but lost literally everything else afterwards. It's a fascinating, relatively suspenseful account of a modern-day tragedy that offers the truest view of civil litigation, at least in the federal courts. Schlichtmann and his three colleagues set out to have the company forced to decontaminate the affected areas, and of course to sue for a major sum of compensation. Pressures take their toll, with Jan and his partners going deeply into debt. This parcel abutted the Aberjona River and extended parallel to the river for about one quarter of a mile. A motion to dismiss pursuant…. Fast forward to the late 80's and early 90's when Schlictman and his crew try to find a link between very sick and dying people and the dumping of toxic waste whic This is the true story of a nine year legal battle involving flamboyant, obsessed and ambitious lawyer, Jan Schlictmann, and two large corporations accused of exposing a cluster of mostly children to water contaminated by industrial pollution.
The first part dealt with the subsurface movement of the contaminants to the wells. So this book was exciting and emotional. Instead Schlictmann goes out rather pathetically, losing all of his material stability and status. Harr was definitely not even-handed. Now working by himself in a small rented office, Jan eventually finds discrepancies in the testimony that would allow for an appeal.